À©µµ¿ì ºñ½ºÅ¸ ºñµð¿ÀÄ«µå °­Á¦ÀÎÁõ.

ÀÌÁø¼ö   
   Á¶È¸ 4341   Ãßõ 25    


¿À´Ã Ž½ºÇϵå¿þ¾î¾î¼­ ±ÛÀ̿öó¿Ô´õ±º¿ä (http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/01/29/xp-vs-vista/page11.html)

Windows XP vs. Vista: The Benchmark Rundown ¶ó´Â Á¦¸ñÀ¸·Î¿ä. ¿ä¾àÇÏÀÚ¸é,

Overall, applications performed as expected, or executed slightly slower than under Windows XP.

There are some programs that showed deeply disappointing performance.

We are disappointed that CPU-intensive applications such as video transcoding with XviD (DVD to XviD MPEG4) or the MainConcept H.264 Encoder performed 18% to nearly 24% slower in our standard benchmark scenarios. Both benchmarks finished much quicker under Windows XP

 À½. Á¦ Áú¹®Àº ºñ½ºÅ¸ ÀÎÁõµÇÁö¾ÊÀº ATI PCI graphic card with 256 MB ramÀ» °­Á¦·Î ÀÎÁõ½ÃÄѼ­ »ç¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ»±î¿ä?  ¾Æ´Ô ¸Ó¸® ÁÁÀ¸½Å Çϵå¿þ¾î ¸¶´Ï¾Æ´Ôµé²²¼­ ¹º°¡ ¹æ¹ýÀ» ¸¸µé¾î³õÀ»±î¿ä?
ªÀº±Û Àϼö·Ï ½ÅÁßÇÏ°Ô.


QnA
Á¦¸ñPage 4461/5611
2014-05   4584825   Á¤ÀºÁØ1
2015-12   1133390   ¹é¸Þ°¡
2009-04   7611   ¹®º´Ã¤
2004-01   7611   À±µ¿Èñ
2004-02   7611   À±°æ½Ä
2013-07   7611   ¸¶ÀÌÄÚÄÚ
2010-05   7611   °¡ºü·Î±¸³ª
2004-02   7611   Á¤¿ì¼®
2016-10   7612   ÇÏ´À
2004-06   7612   ÇÑâ¼ö
2009-12   7612   Â÷Æò¼®
2011-04   7612   ¹«¾Æ
2013-12   7612   ±è¿µ±â
2010-10   7612   cb400
2013-05   7612   ÀÌÁöÆ÷Åä
2004-01   7612   ÀÌÀÏ¿µ
2010-04   7613   ¸í¼ºÈ£
2013-07   7613   À嵿°Ç2014
2004-07   7613   ¹®¼º¼ö
2010-10   7613   俵Áø
2008-04   7613   ÀÌ»óÈñ
2013-07   7613   ¹®¾çÈ£