À©µµ¿ì ºñ½ºÅ¸ ºñµð¿ÀÄ«µå °­Á¦ÀÎÁõ.

ÀÌÁø¼ö   
   Á¶È¸ 4330   Ãßõ 25    


¿À´Ã Ž½ºÇϵå¿þ¾î¾î¼­ ±ÛÀ̿öó¿Ô´õ±º¿ä (http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/01/29/xp-vs-vista/page11.html)

Windows XP vs. Vista: The Benchmark Rundown ¶ó´Â Á¦¸ñÀ¸·Î¿ä. ¿ä¾àÇÏÀÚ¸é,

Overall, applications performed as expected, or executed slightly slower than under Windows XP.

There are some programs that showed deeply disappointing performance.

We are disappointed that CPU-intensive applications such as video transcoding with XviD (DVD to XviD MPEG4) or the MainConcept H.264 Encoder performed 18% to nearly 24% slower in our standard benchmark scenarios. Both benchmarks finished much quicker under Windows XP

 À½. Á¦ Áú¹®Àº ºñ½ºÅ¸ ÀÎÁõµÇÁö¾ÊÀº ATI PCI graphic card with 256 MB ramÀ» °­Á¦·Î ÀÎÁõ½ÃÄѼ­ »ç¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ»±î¿ä?  ¾Æ´Ô ¸Ó¸® ÁÁÀ¸½Å Çϵå¿þ¾î ¸¶´Ï¾Æ´Ôµé²²¼­ ¹º°¡ ¹æ¹ýÀ» ¸¸µé¾î³õÀ»±î¿ä?
ªÀº±Û Àϼö·Ï ½ÅÁßÇÏ°Ô.


QnA
Á¦¸ñPage 5190/5606
2014-05   4546290   Á¤ÀºÁØ1
2015-12   1096256   ¹é¸Þ°¡
2003-05   12027   È«½Â¼ö
2002-10   11893   ±è¼º¼ö
2003-05   10155   °íµ¿Çö
2007-09   4573   À±Á¤»ï
2005-10   5323   ¿À¿øÅÃ
2006-02   5282   °­¹®¼®
2008-03   5839   ±èÁÖ¿µ
2005-08   5389   ¹Úµ¿¼·
2008-09   4996   À̱â¹é
2006-08   5541   ±èÈñÁø
2007-12   4728   À¯È£ÁØ
2003-10   9399   È«ÇѼ®
2006-08   5114   ¼Û¿µ¿À
2006-08   4546   ¿À¼º¼®
2006-03   6893   Çã¿Ï
2007-08   4919   À̱â¹é
2006-11   4652   ±è´ë¼º
2003-03   12026   ÀÌÁ¾¹Î
2007-01   4790   À̰ǹÎ
2005-07   5464   Ç¥µ¿¼ö