À©µµ¿ì ºñ½ºÅ¸ ºñµð¿ÀÄ«µå °­Á¦ÀÎÁõ.

ÀÌÁø¼ö   
   Á¶È¸ 4335   Ãßõ 25    


¿À´Ã Ž½ºÇϵå¿þ¾î¾î¼­ ±ÛÀ̿öó¿Ô´õ±º¿ä (http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/01/29/xp-vs-vista/page11.html)

Windows XP vs. Vista: The Benchmark Rundown ¶ó´Â Á¦¸ñÀ¸·Î¿ä. ¿ä¾àÇÏÀÚ¸é,

Overall, applications performed as expected, or executed slightly slower than under Windows XP.

There are some programs that showed deeply disappointing performance.

We are disappointed that CPU-intensive applications such as video transcoding with XviD (DVD to XviD MPEG4) or the MainConcept H.264 Encoder performed 18% to nearly 24% slower in our standard benchmark scenarios. Both benchmarks finished much quicker under Windows XP

 À½. Á¦ Áú¹®Àº ºñ½ºÅ¸ ÀÎÁõµÇÁö¾ÊÀº ATI PCI graphic card with 256 MB ramÀ» °­Á¦·Î ÀÎÁõ½ÃÄѼ­ »ç¿ëÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ»±î¿ä?  ¾Æ´Ô ¸Ó¸® ÁÁÀ¸½Å Çϵå¿þ¾î ¸¶´Ï¾Æ´Ôµé²²¼­ ¹º°¡ ¹æ¹ýÀ» ¸¸µé¾î³õÀ»±î¿ä?
ªÀº±Û Àϼö·Ï ½ÅÁßÇÏ°Ô.


QnA
Á¦¸ñPage 4448/5607
2014-05   4561908   Á¤ÀºÁØ1
2015-12   1111042   ¹é¸Þ°¡
2007-02   6876   ³²¼º·æ
2007-02   4166   À±°æ¹Î
2007-02   5242   ±è¿ë¼ö_
2007-02   6708   ÀÓÁ¾¿­
2007-02   4390   ȲÀα¹
2007-02   4445   Á¤ÀºÁØ
2007-02   5718   ±è³²¼º
2007-02   4797   À̹®Èì
2007-02   4810   ÀÓ¼ºÈ¯
2007-02   4508   Çã¼®
2007-02   4542   ÀÌÁ¤¿ø
2007-02   4608   À̸íÈÆ
2007-02   4478   ±èµÎÈ«
2007-02   4264   ¹ÚÁöÈ£
2007-02   4709   ±èÇüÁÖ
2007-02   5351   Á¤ÀºÁØ
2007-02   4778   ÀåÁø¼ö
2007-02   4837   È«¼øö
2007-02   4304   ÀÓÁ¾¿­
2007-02   4801   ±èº´¼ö